Lost in's profileLost in FrancePhotosBlogListsMore ![]() | Help |
|
|
November 05 Unstable EquilibriumThinking about the dynamics of relationships last night, I came up with this.
We might feel that the ideal state for a relationship is one of stable equilibrium, this could be represented as a brick sitting on a flat and level surface.
![]() The thing with a brick on a table is that you can leave it there and nothing will happen. You come back tomorrow or next week, it is still there. In engineering terms definition for Static equilibrium is:
The necessary and sufficient conditions for a particle to be in static equilibrium is that the net force acting upon the particle is zero
DO we really want to be in a relationship that is the same tomorrow as today , and for ever more. Do we want to be in a state when the net influence we have on each other is Zero.
I think not.
I think the best relationships are those that have dynamic stability, or unstable equilibrium. for example balancing a broom on your hand.
![]() In theory if you got the broom perfectly upright, did not move your hand, and there was no other external influences, it would stay that way. In reality we know that we need to move our hand to keep it upright. When it starts to fall we move our hand in the same direction and hence restore equilibrium, or stability.
Another example is riding a bike.
Stationary a bike is unstable. It is very hard to sit on a stationary bike, without falling off.
Moving however, the bike is stable
![]() This is due to a combination of the gyroscopic forces from the wheels and the geometry of the bike frame and forks.
I now believe that the best relationships are those that are moving forward and evolving, ones with dyanmic stability. I did not always thing this.
Who wants to be a house brick? not me anymore. Comments (9)
TrackbacksThe trackback URL for this entry is: http://lostinfrance10.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!E7BD06A03CD38E73!9042.trak Weblogs that reference this entry
|
|
|